- Posts: 1230
- Thank you received: 0
New to PNW requests skis to buy recommendations
- Marcus
-
- User
-
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Joedabaker
-
- User
-
- Posts: 1012
- Thank you received: 0
You'll note that I still mount them with an archaic binding system, to try to gain favor with both the old-schoolers and the new-schoolers.
Yeah like putting a record stylus on a MP3 player.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- davidG
-
- User
-
- Posts: 764
- Thank you received: 0
As you can see, I'm also working on my new-skool spelling skills..
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Marcus
-
- User
-
- Posts: 1230
- Thank you received: 0
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Mofro
-
- User
-
- Posts: 170
- Thank you received: 0
Aren't 'skinnyr' skis more turny - moguls, trees, whatever? I also find that there are conditions where being 'in the snow' can be better than being 'on the snow'. I'm <80 underfoot now, looking to maybe go to 90 or so, but don't presently think I want more. I like my beer phat, but that's about it..
No. The "turnyness" of a ski is traditionally a function of the side cut and turn radius, not it's width. Less side cut= longer turn radius= less turny.
semi-annual, as in spring and fall?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- davidG
-
- User
-
- Posts: 764
- Thank you received: 0
No. The "turnyness" of a ski is traditionally a function of the side cut and turn radius, not it's width. Less side cut= longer turn radius= less turny. ...
yes, I'm aware, but I'm thinking of the edge to edge / quickness thing, which, despite what the physics might suggest, still seems to be affected by width..
"semi-annual, as in spring and fall? "

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.