Home > Forum > Categories > Random Tracks > Fat Ski Skinning

Fat Ski Skinning

  • Joedabaker
  • User
  • User
More
16 years 2 months ago #189118 by Joedabaker
Replied by Joedabaker on topic Re: Fat Ski Skinning

I'm getting Dynafits for them. It is NOT hard skinning on the Megas in powder or anything soft.


I guess I don't understand the idea of putting Dynafits on Megas or any other ski that requires bulky skins to take up a good portion of my pack space ???
Like buying a Ferrari and putting nylon polyester tires on it.
Seems like that would put a lot of stress on the Dynafits in the ski area.
The Dukes are a more solid clamp, but a pain for ease of tour IMHO.
I don't understand the need for wide ski touring, so I am biased on my ideas, the advantages don't beat the disadvantages on paper my experiences. I admit that in deep snow the climb up may keep one higher on the surface, but not sure overall of the advantage in the big picture of a season.
Not to be a Donnie Downer, but it struck me that we have a luxurious country where in the midst of economic disaster we can discuss the advantages and disadvantages of skiing where we have enough skis so a pair of skis can sit in a garage until a moment is right to use them.
Guilty as charged ;)

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Scotsman
  • User
  • User
More
16 years 2 months ago #189123 by Scotsman
Replied by Scotsman on topic Re: Fat Ski Skinning
You may not need fat skis Joedabaker!!!, but we need fat skis to keep up with your skinny ass on yur skiiny assed skis on the downhill. ;)

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • andyski
  • User
  • User
More
16 years 2 months ago #189124 by andyski
Replied by andyski on topic Re: Fat Ski Skinning

I guess I don't understand the idea of putting Dynafits on Megas or any other ski that requires bulky skins to take up a good portion of my pack space  ???

I'm getting Dynafits because they tour and ski better, not because they're lighter, although that's a nice side benefit. I know you know this, but I always find it funny how people assume that because Dynafits are light they're somehow only for meadow skipping and Euro-lycra festivals, when in my experience, they ski better (much stiffer, closer to the ski, etc.) than any other touring binding, by far. To each their own, I suppose.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • gregL
  • User
  • User
More
16 years 2 months ago - 16 years 2 months ago #189125 by gregL
Replied by gregL on topic Re: Fat Ski Skinning
Well, I don't tour on anything other than Dynafits anymore, but it took some years to get to that point. Along the way there were stops in Silvrettaland and Fritschiland; when I first got interested in touring I looked at a Dynafit TLT and said "no way I'm staying in that thing." Given SkierHiker's size, that might still be a consideration.

Keep in mind that SkierHiker doesn't really know how much he likes touring yet. It makes more sense to start with a bomber heavy setup that will work for lift-served and go lighter from there as the need arises.

Edit to add: Joedabaker was having fun in backcountry mank when a wide ski had a 70mm waist. When he insists that wide skis are unnecessary and wide skins take up too much room in your pack, take it with a grain of salt.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Joedabaker
  • User
  • User
More
16 years 2 months ago #189126 by Joedabaker
Replied by Joedabaker on topic Re: Fat Ski Skinning

I'm getting Dynafits because they tour and ski better, not because they're lighter, although that's a nice side benefit. I know you know this, but I always find it funny how people assume that because Dynafits are light they're somehow only for meadow skipping and Euro-lycra festivals, when in my experience, they ski better (much stiffer, closer to the ski, etc.) than any other touring binding, by far. To each their own, I suppose.

I agree with all you said above, traveling and the feel of the ski is a great benefit of the dynafit. I guess what I was thinking with the Ferrari/tire comparison was, at least in my case the binding/screws won't be able to endure the beating that is delivered from charging in the resort. I have seen a couple cases of the pincers that got bent from one to many dips.
But they do indeed hold, I'm 6'4 205lbs. Early this season I was skiing a sunbaked foot of new and got shoestring tackled by a buried branch. They did not release, reefed my calf. Since I was wallowing upsidedown in set up cement I almost considered taking my boot off to get out of the binding. I may need to take the din down a couple notches and make sure not to lock the toe. That is on a pair of Classics that go to 10.
Anywho, need to go so I can get my tickets for the Euro-Lycra Festival before they sell out!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Scotsman
  • User
  • User
More
16 years 2 months ago #189127 by Scotsman
Replied by Scotsman on topic Re: Fat Ski Skinning
We've all lost sight of the original question:
I love dynafiddlies but they are not durable or reliable enough for prolonged ( notice nuance) resort skiing.
They are the bestest in the whole wide world and the universe for touring. ;D
For primarily resort skiing , for a big guy, who wants to do a little sidecountry- Dukes or Fritschis. QED.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.