- Posts: 161
- Thank you received: 1
Ready for the Dynafit Plunge
- blackdog102395
-
Topic Author
- User
-
-5'10"
-165lbs
-DIN typically set at 8
-20 days of touring per year
-typically day tour, usually 5K or less
-will be mounted on an Atomic Kongur
-prefer a binding with brakes
-want to go a light a possible (this will be my spring/summer set up) but also value downhill performance and ease of use
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Kneel Turner
-
- User
-
- Posts: 379
- Thank you received: 1
or comforts w/92mm brakes (previous model. Same except for wimpy tour mode pole activator).
I wouldn't go older than comforts. Some significant improvements were made for the comfort, and anything older than a comfort is likely to be pretty old and crusty.
Everything you ever wanted to know, and more, about the world of Dynafit:
www.wildsnow.com/articles/dynafit_faq/dynafit_faq1.html
Keep skimming the lunch money. You need fatter skis.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- all mtn
-
- User
-
- Posts: 231
- Thank you received: 0
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Pete A
-
- User
-
- Posts: 431
- Thank you received: 0
Since you are interested in using brakes, it might be best if you go with the new Radical ST model...the heel lifter on it is new and flips back and forth without needing to rotate the entire heel binding...and rotating the heel part of the binding when using brakes is a pain in the *ss while touring.
...and if you spot an old used pair of Dynafits called the 'Tri Step' selling for cheap, avoid them like the plague
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Charlie Hagedorn
-
- User
-
- Posts: 913
- Thank you received: 1
I love the original Speeds, run without brakes, but they're hard to find new (and Pete's point about adjustability is important).
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- blackdog102395
-
Topic Author
- User
-
- Posts: 161
- Thank you received: 1
Vertical st or radical st w/ 92mm brakes. (last year "vertical", this year "radical" w/a few improvements)
or comforts w/92mm brakes (previous model. Same except for wimpy tour mode pole activator).
I wouldn't go older than comforts. Some significant improvements were made for the comfort, and anything older than a comfort is likely to be pretty old and crusty.
Everything you ever wanted to know, and more, about the world of Dynafit:
www.wildsnow.com/articles/dynafit_faq/dynafit_faq1.html
Keep skimming the lunch money. You need fatter skis.
Part of the impetus for switching to Dynafit is being able to mount a pair of 4FRNT VCT with the Fritschis that are currently on the Kongurs. The 4FRNT is 104 under foot and will make for a better "winter ski," albeit a heavy one. I love the Kongurs. They're pretty light and make for a great spring/summer volcano ski.
Charlie-I briefly considered the Plums and Sportivas until I saw the corresponding price. I'd be skimming for 10 more years to afford those.
Thanks to everyone for the info!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.