House Bill 5186

always wear your tinfoil helmet in the BC.

always wear your tinfoil helmet in the BC.

It's part of the CAF issue gear.

OH THE DRAMA!

This bill about CROWD control:

1. If you knock over a little kid and hurt him and ski away, they will report you to the sheriff - upto $1000 fine (GOOD ON EM!) .

2. If you are sunbathing or skinning in a blind spot and cause and accident  - upto $1000 fine (COOL!).

2. If you ski down or skin up an area closed for avi control or grooming - upto $1000 fine (its not fair to the other skiers, DUGHH?!?!) .

4. If get injured skiing rockface or the waterfall or the Baker Cliffs and require a medevac - YOU ARE CAUGHT (otherwise, you just ski away and no one knows) - upto $1000 fine (that wont even cover your helicopter ride).


Crystal patrol is not going to follow you down Kempers to identify you, they dont have the manpower and they dont get paid for it. Sounds more like this takes them out of the loop for policing it. If they put up the signs, and you go there, it is your own fault for breaking the law.

AND if you dont like CROWDs or traffic jams or traffic rules or traffic officers, why not just ski the backcountry !?!?
Resorts will NEVER EVER close bullion basin, red mountain, snowqualamie slot, interglacier, blewet pass (the possibilities are endless)...

  Exactly.  Read the text of the proposed bill.  There's no mention of snowboarders anywhere.

They use the term "ski" to be all inclusive meaning skiers and snowboarders. There are plenty of skiers who are morons and assholes too, it is not just snowboarders.

Here's a sign laying out one Utah county's take, spotted at SnowBasin 2-11

They use the term "ski" to be all inclusive meaning skiers and snowboarders. There are plenty of skiers who are morons and assholes too, it is not just snowboarders.

Snowwolf,

I'm not picking on snowboarders, (I'm a part-time 'boarder myself).  I was stating the fact that the wording of the proposed bill is $h*tty and full of gaping holes.  Laws need to be very precise and specific, with no "all inclusive meanings".  So far, this proposed bill is severely lacking, and remains an unnecessary waste of time.