- Posts: 53
- Thank you received: 0
Mt. Baker a power plant???
- climbinghighest
-
Topic Author
- User
-
Less
More
18 years 3 weeks ago #180566
by climbinghighest
Mt. Baker a power plant??? was created by climbinghighest
I came across this article. I'm baffled that this could even be considered. Has anyone else heard about this? This has got to be stopped. Im sure if the power plant leases the land it will no longer be available to the people.
www.bellinghamherald.com/northwest/story/304727.html
seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews...html?syndication=rss
www.bellinghamherald.com/northwest/story/304727.html
seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews...html?syndication=rss
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- philfort
-
- User
-
Less
More
- Posts: 259
- Thank you received: 0
18 years 3 weeks ago #180567
by philfort
Replied by philfort on topic Re: Mt. Baker a power plant???
That's pretty short on details - doesn't even say where on Mt Baker it is.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- James Wells
-
- User
-
Less
More
- Posts: 217
- Thank you received: 0
18 years 3 weeks ago #180569
by James Wells
Replied by James Wells on topic Re: Mt. Baker a power plant???
A more complete story:
www.goskagit.com/index.php/news/article/...ergy_in_mount_baker/
Excerpt:
"While construction of many of these proposed power plants is at least a decade away, the plants have become increasingly viable because of laws in Washington, Oregon, California and other Western states requiring portions of each state’s power load to come from clean energy sources.
End Excerpt
More links:
www.geo-energy.org/information/developin...ngton/Mt%20Baker.asp
www.vulcanpower.com/html/geothermal.htm
northofthehotzone.com/category/wa-state/page/2/
So, is power such as this a good thing, or is it better to stick with burning oil and gas obtained far from Mount Baker? Say, from Iraq and Iran?
www.goskagit.com/index.php/news/article/...ergy_in_mount_baker/
Excerpt:
"While construction of many of these proposed power plants is at least a decade away, the plants have become increasingly viable because of laws in Washington, Oregon, California and other Western states requiring portions of each state’s power load to come from clean energy sources.
End Excerpt
More links:
www.geo-energy.org/information/developin...ngton/Mt%20Baker.asp
www.vulcanpower.com/html/geothermal.htm
northofthehotzone.com/category/wa-state/page/2/
So, is power such as this a good thing, or is it better to stick with burning oil and gas obtained far from Mount Baker? Say, from Iraq and Iran?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- climbinghighest
-
Topic Author
- User
-
Less
More
- Posts: 53
- Thank you received: 0
18 years 3 weeks ago #180572
by climbinghighest
Replied by climbinghighest on topic Re: Mt. Baker a power plant???
In my opinion NO. Drilling into Mt. baker to provide power for 100,000 people doesnt seem like the answer to are current energy problems. Im pretty sure if we try hard enough we can come up with a better solution. If were going to come up with an energy that replaces oil, its will need to provide for more than 100,000.
I believe most of the world's oil comes from Saudi Arabi. Not Iraq or Iran. Probably why we have left them alone.
I believe most of the world's oil comes from Saudi Arabi. Not Iraq or Iran. Probably why we have left them alone.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- greenrider
-
- User
-
Less
More
- Posts: 16
- Thank you received: 0
18 years 3 weeks ago #180578
by greenrider
Replied by greenrider on topic Re: Mt. Baker a power plant???
Here's a fairly thorough article.
www.thenewstribune.com/news/local/story/260687.html
The Vulcan power execs say there is a better than 80 percent chance the plant will be built (there is a comment that this may be overly optimistic).
The article also indicates that there are likely many sites in Washington that would be good for geothermal energy. It specifically mentions, a "rough triangle from Mount St. Helens and Mount Adams to Mount Hood."
www.thenewstribune.com/news/local/story/260687.html
The Vulcan power execs say there is a better than 80 percent chance the plant will be built (there is a comment that this may be overly optimistic).
The article also indicates that there are likely many sites in Washington that would be good for geothermal energy. It specifically mentions, a "rough triangle from Mount St. Helens and Mount Adams to Mount Hood."
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- philfort
-
- User
-
Less
More
- Posts: 259
- Thank you received: 0
18 years 3 weeks ago #180582
by philfort
Replied by philfort on topic Re: Mt. Baker a power plant???
The area around Baker Lake is already full of clearcuts - seems like a power plant with "minimal lighting, along with natural rock, soil and vegetation on the sides and roof of each facility to blend it with the surrounding landscape" isn't the end of the world.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.