- Posts: 1
- Thank you received: 0
Passholder loyalty -- and vice versa.
- jamesp
-
- User
-
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Alan Brunelle
-
- User
-
- Posts: 260
- Thank you received: 0
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Larry_Trotter
-
- User
-
- Posts: 561
- Thank you received: 0
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- AndyP
-
- User
-
- Posts: 15
- Thank you received: 0
<br><br>I always have liked the analysis of snow data on your site, Amar. I do have to ask, though. Have you ever looked an autocorrelation plot of the snow data? I haven't lived around here long but over the last couple winters it seems like a good one has been followed by a bad one. Here is what I remember from the last few years at SkiBowl.<br><br>2005 - Closed most of the year<br>2004 - Great year, lots of snow late December/January<br>2003 - Not so good, closed for a while in January. Like this year there was some new snow late in the season.<br>2002 - Very good year. Lots of snow through March<br>2001 - A little fuzzy but I think this was a decent year<br>2000 - We didn't live here then but this was a record (or near record) year from what I have heard.<br><br>We usually get passes at SkiBowl and while this year didn't work out, I was glad to hear about next year's offer.<br>Quote from Stevens Pass Letter to Pass Holders:<br>However, the probability of next season being below normal is about 50% (roughly half the seasons must be below normal, right?). Unfortunately, it's really even more than that, since about 55-60% of seasons fall below the average (mean) in the type of probability distribution that snowfall stats have. In other words, the median value is less than the average, which is skewed upward by the occasional huge snow years.<br><br>Sorry for talking about math and stuff.<br>
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.