- Posts: 669
- Thank you received: 0
Home > Forum > Categories > Lift Accessed Ski Reports > Jan 14, 2014, Alp + Central, Scientific Suckage
Jan 14, 2014, Alp + Central, Scientific Suckage
- gregL
-
- User
-
Less
More
12 years 1 month ago #219670
by gregL
Replied by gregL on topic Re: Jan 14, 2014, Alp + Central, Scientific Suckage
It got a lot better at Alpy as it warmed up - by noon it was skiing like decent spring snow and there were probably only 40 people on the mountain.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Snoqualmonix
-
- User
-
Less
More
- Posts: 141
- Thank you received: 0
12 years 1 month ago #219673
by Snoqualmonix
Replied by Snoqualmonix on topic Re: Jan 14, 2014, Alp + Central, Scientific Suckage
"Early Season Conditions Exist"
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- haggis
-
- User
-
Less
More
- Posts: 255
- Thank you received: 0
12 years 1 month ago #219676
by haggis
Replied by haggis on topic Re: Jan 14, 2014, Alp + Central, Scientific Suckage
I'm getting a deferal for my pass and the family, this is the only consolation for busting myself up. Since we invested over $1k on passes this seems logical. When I'm fixed we'll do day passes at Crystal since kids <10 are free there so its cheaper to ski with a family at Crystal that Snoqualmie for a daily trip if you can fathom that thought.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- flowing alpy
-
- User
-
Less
More
- Posts: 1272
- Thank you received: 0
12 years 1 month ago #219486
by flowing alpy
Replied by flowing alpy on topic Re: Jan 14, 2014, Alp + Central, Scientific Suckage
i think more people should adopt this policy and go to the southern resort with their little kids.
b
b
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- CascadeSkier
-
- User
-
Less
More
- Posts: 147
- Thank you received: 0
12 years 1 month ago #219687
by CascadeSkier
...since science is my schtick, i'll offer up my analysis of this report...
1 = sucks
10 = epic
run 1 = 1
run 2 = 1
run 3 = 1
n = 3
mean = 1
S.D. = 0
so i'd say that since you tried to remove variation from your collection process, then the data indicates that conditions indeed did suck...
Replied by CascadeSkier on topic Re: Jan 14, 2014, Alp + Central, Scientific Suckage
In the interest of science...
...since science is my schtick, i'll offer up my analysis of this report...
1 = sucks
10 = epic
run 1 = 1
run 2 = 1
run 3 = 1
n = 3
mean = 1
S.D. = 0
so i'd say that since you tried to remove variation from your collection process, then the data indicates that conditions indeed did suck...
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- pipedream
-
Topic Author
- User
-
Less
More
- Posts: 629
- Thank you received: 0
12 years 1 month ago #219689
by pipedream
Is the scale from suck to epic natural numbers only? And why start at 1 instead of 0? A scale of 0-9 requires no tens place. We could represent them with a single character instead of a short, int or string - think of the space we'd save with these reports!
Okay, okay. I'll get back to mining the bits... fortunately every eight I produce generates another byte to feed myself with.
Replied by pipedream on topic Re: Jan 14, 2014, Alp + Central, Scientific Suckage
...since science is my schtick, i'll offer up my analysis of this report...
1 = sucks
10 = epic
run 1 = 1
run 2 = 1
run 3 = 1
n = 3
mean = 1
S.D. = 0
so i'd say that since you tried to remove variation from your collection process, then the data indicates that conditions indeed did suck...
Is the scale from suck to epic natural numbers only? And why start at 1 instead of 0? A scale of 0-9 requires no tens place. We could represent them with a single character instead of a short, int or string - think of the space we'd save with these reports!
Okay, okay. I'll get back to mining the bits... fortunately every eight I produce generates another byte to feed myself with.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.