Alpental 1/20-21

  • Larry_Trotter
  • User
  • User
More
19 years 2 weeks ago #212792 by Larry_Trotter
Replied by Larry_Trotter on topic Re: Alpental 1/20-21
If you are going to go to the RCW then we might as well be current.  This is all legaleze stuff.....

Technically, the RCW cite listed by the Couloir Mag article is out of date - it cites RCW 70.117.20:

70.117.020 Standard of conduct -- Prohibited acts -- Responsibility.  [1989 c 81 § 3; 1977 ex.s. c 139 § 2.]  Recodified as RCW 79A.45.030 pursuant to 1999 c 249 § 1601.


And...

70.117.010 Ski area sign requirements.  [1991 c 75 § 1; 1989 c 81 § 2; 1977 ex.s. c 139 § 1.]  Recodified as RCW 79A.45.010 pursuant to 1999 c 249 § 1601.


So... the Current Stuff (pretty much the same):

apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=79A.45&full=true :

Chapter 79A.45 RCW
Skiing and commercial ski activity 

Chapter Listing


RCW Sections
79A.45.010 Ski area sign requirements.
79A.45.020 "Trails" or "runs" defined.
79A.45.030 Standard of conduct -- Prohibited acts -- Responsibility.
79A.45.040 Skiing outside of trails or boundaries -- Notice of skier responsibility.
79A.45.050 Leaving scene of skiing accident -- Penalty -- Notice.
79A.45.060 Insurance requirements for operators

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.