- Posts: 269
- Thank you received: 8
New Summit Uphill Policy in effect now
- kamtron
-
- User
-
Less
More
4 years 2 months ago #235389
by kamtron
Replied by kamtron on topic New Summit Uphill Policy in effect now
It's $5 people. Not a big deal. I'm just glad they have a system worked out. Baker is "no touring" ever.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Brooski
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- MangyMarmot
-
- User
-
Less
More
- Posts: 21
- Thank you received: 0
4 years 2 months ago #235390
by MangyMarmot
Replied by MangyMarmot on topic New Summit Uphill Policy in effect now
I guess since it is private land, they can make whatever rules they want.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- snoqpass
-
- User
-
Less
More
- Posts: 252
- Thank you received: 0
4 years 2 months ago #235391
by snoqpass
Replied by snoqpass on topic New Summit Uphill Policy in effect now
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- snoqpass
-
- User
-
Less
More
- Posts: 252
- Thank you received: 0
4 years 2 months ago #235392
by snoqpass
Replied by snoqpass on topic New Summit Uphill Policy in effect now
Mission Ridge policy says you have to be back in the base area by 7am
www.missionridge.com/uphill-policy-2021-22
www.missionridge.com/uphill-policy-2021-22
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- snoqpass
-
- User
-
Less
More
- Posts: 252
- Thank you received: 0
4 years 2 months ago #235393
by snoqpass
Replied by snoqpass on topic New Summit Uphill Policy in effect now
Note also the private land surrounding Beaver Lake (NW of the old Ski Acres plot). I'm guessing that may be a remnant of the old Seattle Ski Club ski jump hill from the 1930s.
Cool. History, written in the landscape.
Have you seen this plan of the ski jump at Summit West?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- kamtron
-
- User
-
Less
More
- Posts: 269
- Thank you received: 8
4 years 2 months ago #235394
by kamtron
Replied by kamtron on topic New Summit Uphill Policy in effect now
It doesn't really matter or not whether a ski area is on public or private land. The ski areas have a contract with the forest service which allows them to decide the rules there. Mt Baker doesn't like ski tourists, so it chooses to ban them (after years of "no official policy"). Not much you can do about it except try and not piss them off and get banned from the area & even the parking lots (yep, they can do and have done this).
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.