- Posts: 3
- Thank you received: 0
Introducing Cascade Backcountry Alliance
- Beardedclam
-
- User
-
To be clear, I'm trying to help create space for a serious discussion between reasonable people.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- kamtron
-
- User
-
- Posts: 269
- Thank you received: 8
Keep up the good work, CBA
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Jim Oker
-
- User
-
- Posts: 901
- Thank you received: 0
Frankly while I think it's great and important to have some organized effort on access hereabouts, I'm finding it hard to get excited about pitching in given those stated priorities. It might help me if I could see a little past them - for instance could you share any sort of "grading rubric" you used for stack ranking the great many possible "plowing" projects one could imagine in our region? I think it might be quite helpful to expose that and have a robust community discussion about it, which would also let folks like me think out what additional ideas to contribute along with deciding whether we want to contribute more in terms of time and energy toward your mission. I don't think this would need to be a time-consuming thing for you to put out there, assuming you guys did have some method to how you winnowed to your current list.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- CBAlliance
-
Topic Author
- User
-
- Posts: 29
- Thank you received: 0
Hey CBAlliance - thanks for reaching out to the community here and giving us a chance to have input. Like a few others here, I find myself questioning the choices for priorities on the "plowing" part of your projects plan.
Frankly while I think it's great and important to have some organized effort on access hereabouts, I'm finding it hard to get excited about pitching in given those stated priorities. It might help me if I could see a little past them - for instance could you share any sort of "grading rubric" you used for stack ranking the great many possible "plowing" projects one could imagine in our region? I think it might be quite helpful to expose that and have a robust community discussion about it, which would also let folks like me think out what additional ideas to contribute along with deciding whether we want to contribute more in terms of time and energy toward your mission. I don't think this would need to be a time-consuming thing for you to put out there, assuming you guys did have some method to how you winnowed to your current list.
Hi Jim,
Thanks for your response. Let me say right up front that there's no formula here. I wish we had one- I'd share it in a second! We lack the resources to even put together data. I understand that the project selection seems a little haphazard, and that is in large part because we are really shooting for things that are feasible and that we have resources and connections to maybe make happen. I will acknowledge that there isn't one obvious project for us to be throwing all our time and money at, such as the Hurricane Ridge road in Olympic NP. So, what's the point? And why the current plowing priorities, which are Twin Lakes/Skyline on 542 and the Kendall/Commonwealth TH?
Our plowing priorities are based on reducing pressure on the two most heavily accessed backcountry areas (anecdotally), which are Snoqualmie Pass and Mt. Baker. Lot 4 at Alpental and the Table Mountain/Bagley Lakes area are under huge pressure from backcountry users. These areas face the greatest potential user conflicts, present the largest issues to resorts, and also frankly just offer a crowded scene that bums everyone out. You can read flowingalpy's dispatches from the front, if you want. Steven's Pass also obviously has issues,* but to my point above has far fewer plowing-related solutions. But to make it simple: where there are too many people trying to go to the exact same place through resort infrastructure, they need to have options to spread out. Otherwise, we stand to lose access as resorts become fed up. We can either argue amongst ourselves about the theoretical legality of these losses (e.g. Crystal), or we can try and do something productive about it. Plowing is a thing we can do.
So, let's say you're not too thrilled about these plowing projects because you feel they don't represent a great way for the BC community to access anything cool. As you might have read, many people feel that the huddled masses (or just insert some insults for whatever group you don't like) should continue to plague the easy front country, while they ski their secret stash in relative peace. To that point, I would say that making access more straightforward or plowing a part of a road for parking just ups the standard. There's plenty of places to go out there (as in, millions of acres), and no one is stopping you from walking farther. The "don't blow up the spot" debate has been hashed to death. It happens every time a guidebook comes out, or someone posts a TR of a "stash," ad nauseum. If we start to lose access to places, no one will be there at the TH to check whether you are a super-rad local or not. We will simply be banned. With that said, many places that people are dreaming of getting to are low on the feasibility scale. That's not to say we will never try. It's just that it's hard and we'd rather start with some easier wins and establish good relationships so that we can then go push on agencies for bigger goals that we all might share.
We have talked about putting out a poll to folks to see what they are most interested in, which would provide the objective process you're looking for. We might still do that in some form in the future to help determine what these next steps for plowing might be.
Honestly, I think it's more transparent and fairly useful right now to just have a discussion about it. Maybe I will compile a list of ideas and shape that into a poll. I'd still like people to have space to question the premise. Plenty of people have spoken up about their priorities. What do YOU want to have plowed? Nothing? A berm in front of every skiing house in Seattle? A road to the top of Rainier? Let's hear it.
-Conrad
*If any of you have particular concerns about Stevens, feel free to message Rowan Stewart directly.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- flowing alpy
-
- User
-
- Posts: 1272
- Thank you received: 0
that are not being followed nor enforced. security clean up in LoT4
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- alecapone
-
- User
-
- Posts: 202
- Thank you received: 1
I have suggestions, but most are providing more day and overnight parking.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.