- Posts: 2
- Thank you received: 0
Seeking quiver advice--volcano/ long tour ski
- jaker
-
- User
-
Less
More
8 years 11 months ago #229019
by jaker
Replied by jaker on topic Re: Seeking quiver advice--volcano/ long tour ski
I've really enjoyed my BD Helio 105 and wouldn't hesitate to grab one of the narrower versions like the 95 for a long tour/volcano ski given the chance.
I love the way they ride, I feel very confident on them and I'm by no means the strongest skier on the mountain.
Only thing about them that I don't like is that they do get knocked around at high speeds in weird snow but they turn on a dime even in a 185 so I have no problem shutting it down when needed. Highly recommend!
I love the way they ride, I feel very confident on them and I'm by no means the strongest skier on the mountain.
Only thing about them that I don't like is that they do get knocked around at high speeds in weird snow but they turn on a dime even in a 185 so I have no problem shutting it down when needed. Highly recommend!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Good2Go
-
- User
-
Less
More
- Posts: 115
- Thank you received: 0
8 years 11 months ago #229020
by Good2Go
Ha! It's all relative, I guess. I had the 180-ish version and found them to be all tip and no tail in deep pow (5'10", 165-sh, aggressive skier, but not a big hucker). Worked great up to about 6" of fresh, but beyond that I just couldn't get them to plane like I wanted/expected. To me, they skie like "classic skis of yore" (i.e., more in the pow than on the pow). And, the frequent reports of them snapping in half sealed the decision to sell. Mythics plane great. I wouldn't pick them for the deepest days, but surprisingly find myself choosing them way more than expected.
Replied by Good2Go on topic Re: Seeking quiver advice--volcano/ long tour ski
I totally disagree about the Cho Oyus skiing powder terribly. I'm continually surprised at how good they are and since this winter use them for way more powder days than anything else. I also have some 115 waist skis and now really only use them when we're talking knee deep skin tracks.
To each their own ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Ha! It's all relative, I guess. I had the 180-ish version and found them to be all tip and no tail in deep pow (5'10", 165-sh, aggressive skier, but not a big hucker). Worked great up to about 6" of fresh, but beyond that I just couldn't get them to plane like I wanted/expected. To me, they skie like "classic skis of yore" (i.e., more in the pow than on the pow). And, the frequent reports of them snapping in half sealed the decision to sell. Mythics plane great. I wouldn't pick them for the deepest days, but surprisingly find myself choosing them way more than expected.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.