- Posts: 913
- Thank you received: 1
Have NWAC ratings been reduced?
- Charlie Hagedorn
-
- User
-
Less
More
10 years 1 month ago #225451
by Charlie Hagedorn
Replied by Charlie Hagedorn on topic Re: Have NWAC ratings been reduced?
My experiences in the field during this cycle have been in line with NWAC predictions. Each day out, we didn't see the truly reactive instability I associate with 'High' danger. There haven't been reports of any low-likelihood, huge-consequence strata, either.
Sure is a lot of snow, though.
Sure is a lot of snow, though.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Kneel Turner
-
- User
-
Less
More
- Posts: 379
- Thank you received: 1
10 years 1 month ago #225455
by Kneel Turner
Replied by Kneel Turner on topic Re: Have NWAC ratings been reduced?
Have there been many reports of large natural avalanches?
Based on my observations they are right on. There is an amazing amount of new unconsolidated snow, but from what I've seen, it's staying put unless directly influenced on suspect terrain. Have you noticed the flocking on the trees? This snow is pretty comfortable sitting where it fell.
I dont think forecasting avalanche danger takes into consideration the threat of tree well immersion and deep snow safety (at least I hope it doesn't).
An avalanche's threat to me and my ski buddies is only one small part of my personal risk/benefit analysis.
Based on my observations they are right on. There is an amazing amount of new unconsolidated snow, but from what I've seen, it's staying put unless directly influenced on suspect terrain. Have you noticed the flocking on the trees? This snow is pretty comfortable sitting where it fell.
I dont think forecasting avalanche danger takes into consideration the threat of tree well immersion and deep snow safety (at least I hope it doesn't).
An avalanche's threat to me and my ski buddies is only one small part of my personal risk/benefit analysis.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.