- Posts: 304
- Thank you received: 0
TLT5 Performance: PNW reviews requested
- skykilo
-
- User
-
The first day I skied them I thought the lean angle was going to bother me. Both times since then it's felt fine.
Would've skied them today but they don't seem like the right thing for a diet of groomers and bumps at Taos. I'll respond to this thread with any new relevant insights on my part.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Plinko
-
- User
-
- Posts: 165
- Thank you received: 0
The only other observation I have to add is the lack of mass at times causes the ski rig to be deflected more easily by chicken heads, frozen blocks, etc where previously, with a heavier set up, it would blast through with no thought.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- andyski
-
Topic Author
- User
-
- Posts: 250
- Thank you received: 0
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Plinko
-
- User
-
- Posts: 165
- Thank you received: 0
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- skykilo
-
- User
-
- Posts: 304
- Thank you received: 0
Furthermore, I wouldn't want to use any Dynafit binding on the market to ski bumps at Taos. I'm much more confident in these Plums until they give me a reason not to be. They seem quite robust.
They do just fine on groomers if that's your piste du jour. I've skied 68mm, 88mm, and 108mm waist skies and all perform well with the TLT5P, both on and off piste.
The only other observation I have to add is the lack of mass at times causes the ski rig to be deflected more easily by chicken heads, frozen blocks, etc where previously, with a heavier set up, it would blast through with no thought.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- andyski
-
Topic Author
- User
-
- Posts: 250
- Thank you received: 0
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.