- Posts: 464
- Thank you received: 0
Muiricane
- garyabrill
-
- User
-
Muir? The NWS revised their predicted winds for Wednesday downward significantly since the morning of March 1:
And the actual winds at Muir turned out to be a TOTAL disappointment, only reaching 56 mph, which is pathetic compared to the numerous 100+ mph events. That value seems way too low (especially considering that Paradise reached 43 mph), and it could perhaps be a sign of partial riming of the anemometer which prevented recording a true value.
I had the same thought about rime-caused friction on the anenometer when I saw the telemetry for Muir. It seemed to have trouble getting above 50 mph and was nearly the same for a few hours around the time of the peak winds.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- garyabrill
-
- User
-
- Posts: 464
- Thank you received: 0
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- aaron_wright
-
- User
-
- Posts: 429
- Thank you received: 0
The effects of the wind observed at mission ridge today were amazing. Really cool sastrugi, huge difts(8-10') in some spots, very large cornices and a cat track that I had skied on at around 1330 yesterday was completely gone, what had once been a cat track on a steep hillside was now just a steep slope. The uphill cut on the cat track was probably 10-15' the day before.Don't give up on Mission Ridge yet, they are still in the running with a nice 134 mph gust on 3/10: www.nwac.us/weatherdata/missionridge/10day/
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- garyabrill
-
- User
-
- Posts: 464
- Thank you received: 0
Glad I didn't get out there today, afterall. None of my partners were up for an "adventure". So much for the 4th aspect until snows return.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.