- Posts: 913
- Thank you received: 1
Mt Rainier landmark meets wrecking ball
- Charlie Hagedorn
-
- User
-
Less
More
17 years 2 months ago #183972
by Charlie Hagedorn
Replied by Charlie Hagedorn on topic Re: Mt Rainier landmark meets wrecking ball
Pretty sure it's true. Can't find an NPS page that says so, but,
community.seattletimes.nwsource.com/arch...4&slug=nwwtrailmix24
Heard it many times from many sources.
community.seattletimes.nwsource.com/arch...4&slug=nwwtrailmix24
Heard it many times from many sources.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Gary Vogt
-
- User
-
Less
More
- Posts: 511
- Thank you received: 8
17 years 2 months ago #183978
by Gary Vogt
I've heard similar stories for decades, but they re "legend" according to Kurt Repanshek at
www.nationalparkstraveler.com/2008/11/en...ainier-national-park
Interesting that at two million it was the most expensive NPS VC ever built in 1966. Now the replacement at 22 million is toward the low end compared to other major projects of the National Pork Service. For example, the new Gettysburg Museum came in at $110,000,000 ???
Replied by Gary Vogt on topic Re: Mt Rainier landmark meets wrecking ball
... the JVC was originally designed for a park in HI, but for some reason the couldn't build it, and not wanting the plans to go to waste, decided to use them at Rainier. Anyone else heard this or can confirm this?
I've heard similar stories for decades, but they re "legend" according to Kurt Repanshek at
www.nationalparkstraveler.com/2008/11/en...ainier-national-park
Interesting that at two million it was the most expensive NPS VC ever built in 1966. Now the replacement at 22 million is toward the low end compared to other major projects of the National Pork Service. For example, the new Gettysburg Museum came in at $110,000,000 ???
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Larry_Trotter
-
Topic Author
- User
-
Less
More
- Posts: 561
- Thank you received: 0
17 years 2 months ago #183981
by Larry_Trotter
Replied by Larry_Trotter on topic Re: Mt Rainier landmark meets wrecking ball
If "Form follows function", then I guess the function of the HJVC was to wander around in circles... It wasn't that bad, but I just have squareness in my mind when it comes to buildings. The Space Needle, the King Dome (70'S), the Jetson's.... something was in the water in the Sixties. I can't imagine a square Space Needle, but is is weird when you are up there.
But what is all this nonsense about the building fitting the setting? Nothing fits the setting except a marmot hole. Architecture is in our minds.... we have square minds. And then "form follows function"... like tall steep roofs so the snow falls off.
But what is all this nonsense about the building fitting the setting? Nothing fits the setting except a marmot hole. Architecture is in our minds.... we have square minds. And then "form follows function"... like tall steep roofs so the snow falls off.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Larry_Trotter
-
Topic Author
- User
-
Less
More
- Posts: 561
- Thank you received: 0
17 years 2 months ago #183985
by Larry_Trotter
Call in the Predator Drones:
Weather Slows Demolition: blogs.thenewstribune.com/adventure/2008/...tion_of_visitor_cent
Replied by Larry_Trotter on topic Re: Mt Rainier landmark meets wrecking ball
Call in the Predator Drones:
Weather Slows Demolition: blogs.thenewstribune.com/adventure/2008/...tion_of_visitor_cent
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.