- Posts: 150
- Thank you received: 0
Home > Forum > Categories > Random Tracks > "Telemark" skis mounted with Randonee bindings - a faux pas?
"Telemark" skis mounted with Randonee bindings - a faux pas?
- DG
-
Topic Author
- User
-
Less
More
17 years 6 months ago #182625
by DG
"Telemark" skis mounted with Randonee bindings - a faux pas? was created by DG
My girlfriend is looking to buy some skis, and we found a set of K2 "telemark" skis (shi devils) on sale. She would be mounting them w/ randonee bindings, though, which begs the question - is there really any difference between a telemark and an AT ski?
I'm pretty sure that it doesn't matter - I think my skis were technically sold for telemark but I have randonee bindings on them and they ski just fine. But, just wanted a second or third opinion - is there anything significant that makes a ski company label their skis telemark vs. AT??
I'm pretty sure that it doesn't matter - I think my skis were technically sold for telemark but I have randonee bindings on them and they ski just fine. But, just wanted a second or third opinion - is there anything significant that makes a ski company label their skis telemark vs. AT??
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Marcus
-
- User
-
Less
More
- Posts: 1230
- Thank you received: 0
17 years 6 months ago #182627
by Marcus
Replied by Marcus on topic Re: "Telemark" skis mounted with Randonee bindings - a faux pas?
Go for it -- several of my friends have AT bindings on tele skis of one iteration or another. Tele skis have gotten stiffer and much more capable and, as far as I can tell, are very similar in most aspects to AT skis, unless the skier is very particular. Flex patterns may be a little different, but the construction is probably very similar.
The only thing I might worry about is whether the area under the heel of the boot has enough reinforcement/beef to take a binding mount. Unless your girlfriend is a really aggressive skier, I doubt it would be a problem. I think most K2 skis are wood core, too, so they probably offer good purchase for the mounting screws back there...
The only thing I might worry about is whether the area under the heel of the boot has enough reinforcement/beef to take a binding mount. Unless your girlfriend is a really aggressive skier, I doubt it would be a problem. I think most K2 skis are wood core, too, so they probably offer good purchase for the mounting screws back there...
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Randito
-
- User
-
Less
More
- Posts: 960
- Thank you received: 1
17 years 6 months ago #182629
by Randito
Replied by Randito on topic Re: "Telemark" skis mounted with Randonee bindings - a faux pas?
If those K2 "telemark" skis have telemark binding inserts your could get the "Voile TLT adapter plate " and not even need to drill (if by AT bindings you mean Dynafits)
www.voile-usa.com/Merchant2/merchant.mvc...e=CS&Product_Count=2
www.voile-usa.com/Merchant2/merchant.mvc...e=CS&Product_Count=2
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- DG
-
Topic Author
- User
-
Less
More
- Posts: 150
- Thank you received: 0
17 years 6 months ago #182630
by DG
Replied by DG on topic Re: "Telemark" skis mounted with Randonee bindings - a faux
Thanks for the info - that makes sense. I was thinking Fritschi or Naxo bindings, though, as she would be using the skis for both inbounds and backcountry skiing. The skis have already been drilled for telemark bindings, so it sounds like they would require additional drilling for the AT bindings...
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- ski_photomatt
-
- User
-
Less
More
- Posts: 141
- Thank you received: 0
17 years 6 months ago #182632
by ski_photomatt
Replied by ski_photomatt on topic Re: "Telemark" skis mounted with Randonee bindings - a faux pas?
Almost all (or all?) K2 tele skis have pre-drilled inserts for standard 4 hole tele mounts (Randy's post). I don't know if this will interfere with mounting AT bindings or not.
My wife has a pair Shi Devils from a few years ago (the blue ones) and hates them. She is a strong tele skier and prefers a stiffer ski, but found the K2's to be too soft. She replaced them with yellow foam core BD Crossbows (a much stiffer ski) for spring and summer touring. We also found the skis to be pretty thin (from base to top sheet, not side-to-side) and dimpled the base when installing the plates for Voile ski crampons with the stock screws. Again, not sure what this means for an AT mount.
My wife has a pair Shi Devils from a few years ago (the blue ones) and hates them. She is a strong tele skier and prefers a stiffer ski, but found the K2's to be too soft. She replaced them with yellow foam core BD Crossbows (a much stiffer ski) for spring and summer touring. We also found the skis to be pretty thin (from base to top sheet, not side-to-side) and dimpled the base when installing the plates for Voile ski crampons with the stock screws. Again, not sure what this means for an AT mount.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- korup
-
- User
-
Less
More
- Posts: 220
- Thank you received: 0
17 years 6 months ago #182633
by korup
Replied by korup on topic Re: "Telemark" skis mounted with Randonee bindings - a faux
My impression was that AT binders on tele skis was OK, but the reverse might not work, since the forces generated by telebindings could rip out of a non-reinforced ski.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.