- Posts: 259
- Thank you received: 0
Why sno-tel sites more reliable than telemetry?
- philfort
-
Topic Author
- User
-
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Jeff Huber
-
- User
-
- Posts: 371
- Thank you received: 0
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- philfort
-
Topic Author
- User
-
- Posts: 259
- Thank you received: 0
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Jeff Huber
-
- User
-
- Posts: 371
- Thank you received: 0
<br>We were able to attribute this to the crust we found. We wouldn't have been able to do this thru the 6hr Snotel sites.<br> 11 5 1600 29 27 98 99 21 42 247 .16 .77 3 39<br> 11 5 1700 32 30 99 100 28 52 254 .2 .97 3 40<br> 11 5 1800 33 34 99 100 28 73 274 .35 1.32 3 39<br> 11 5 1900 32 35 100 98 33 66 281 .28 1.6 45 38<br> 11 5 2000 30 33 100 99 30 67 282 .08 1.68 3 37<br> 11 5 2100 29 32 99 99 30 67 281 .12 1.8 3 37<br>... gets even colder over next few hours...<br>
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- philfort
-
Topic Author
- User
-
- Posts: 259
- Thank you received: 0
went above freezing from 7pm on 11/5 and stayed pretty warm till midnight.
I agree, in general, they don't have quite the frequency or amount of data, and are less useful than the telemetry sites (and how else do you find out a freak storm dropped 40 inches of snow in the eastern Olympics, as happened at one point last year ;-) ). But whatever they use to communicate their info to civilization seems a lot more reliable.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- ron j
-
- User
-
- Posts: 1089
- Thank you received: 0
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.