Stevens 12/9

  • SeaTacExpat
  • Topic Author
  • User
  • User
More
15 years 2 months ago #216161 by SeaTacExpat
Stevens 12/9 was created by SeaTacExpat
Went to Stevens, considered doing a backside tour, settled on staying in-bounds owing to the deep, fresh Cascade Concrete (6-12"+ of new). Good coverage on runs, sketchy coverage off of runs - Tye Bowl, for example, was pretty poorly covered.
Visibility was pretty poor on the top half of the mountain, with another 4-5" of very wet, very cohesive snow falling during the day.

Talked to Ski Patrol - they reported seeing natural releases on the backside during the day. For practice, hiked up the ridge on the backside past the Tye Mill chair, and dug a pit off the ridge going down to the backside, looking for windloading (following the NWAC report); found a 165 cm snowpack, with a ~55 cm layer of very cohesive wet powder (fist penetration) over 110 cm of slightly denser snow (1 finger penetration). Did two column compression tests, both failed around CT23-24 (3rd or 4th shoulder tap), with the upper 55 cm column sliding as a slightly crumbly soft slab.

Probably stable enough for a lower-angle tour on the backside, but we didn't relish the idea of setting a skin track up back through it.

Ski Patrol and lift ops also were doing backside lift prep for a potential weekend opening of the backside.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Mike Cheney
  • User
  • User
More
15 years 2 months ago #216190 by Mike Cheney
Replied by Mike Cheney on topic Re: Stevens 12/9
Thanks for the report. Excellent write up, and again nice getting up there with you.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.