- Posts: 23
- Thank you received: 0
Military helicopters - Liberty Bell Roadless Area
- mattfirth
-
Topic Author
- User
-
These landings could occur anytime 24/7, 365 days a year and could potentially be used by other military bases thereby expanding the impact.
For TAY folks the landing in the Azurite Pk area could impact backcountry skiing/touring in a significant way.
Comments are needed by July 30th. Scoping document here
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- T. Eastman
-
- User
-
- Posts: 288
- Thank you received: 0
As the term "wilderness area"s used in describing practices in the "Fly Friendly Program" is not capitalized, this could then mean that areas other than designated "Wilderness Areas" could be avoided by these training operations.
The maps showing the MTAs is showing no USFS or NPS land designations to base the scoping information on.
Do the noise standards allow for wind carried noise?
A complete EIS should be required for this program that uses the resources of multiple agencies near a National Park and Wilderness Area.
No-action is the preferred alternative!!!
What next, Navy wanting to run subs in Ross Lake?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Randito
-
- User
-
- Posts: 960
- Thank you received: 1
...
What next, Navy wanting to run subs in Ross Lake?
The navy already has an extensive facility on Lake Pond Oreille and Ross Lake has nothing on that.
None of the proposed sites lie within designated wilderness. Since military helicopter s are used to rescue citizens from mountain environments stateside and soldiers in foreign mountains don't they need a place to train?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- mattfirth
-
Topic Author
- User
-
- Posts: 23
- Thank you received: 0
The navy already has an extensive facility on Lake Pond Oreille and Ross Lake has nothing on that.
None of the proposed sites lie within designated wilderness. Since military helicopter s are used to rescue citizens from mountain environments stateside and soldiers in foreign mountains don't they need a place to train?
Up to seven helicopter at a time over a four hour period of landings and approaches. Just talking about the landing sites north of Lake Chelan - one is within spitting distance of a popular trail between Martin Lk and Cooney Lk in the Sawtooths, one (Azurite Pk area) is within the sound shed of the Pacific Crest trail and in mountain goat habitat (quite a few of studies showing impacts on goats from helicopters) and one near Tiffany Lake, a popular fishing lake and hiking area. Frequency is unknown as in the future other bases may use these sites also. Think there'll be any direct, indirect and cumulative impacts?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Jason4
-
- User
-
- Posts: 178
- Thank you received: 0
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- T. Eastman
-
- User
-
- Posts: 288
- Thank you received: 0
I agree that there are some serious issues to consider here but not proposing an alternative while saying no is just a NIMBY reaction.
... well, as "No Action" is one of the alternatives on the scoping document...
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.