K2 8611's

Those of you skiing the 8611, what do you think of it compared to the Shuksan...this years model? ???

I ski on the original 8611(the red ones). It is a bit soft, but that is probably one of the sacrifices for having a fairly light weight ski. I believe that some changes were made since the ski I have was produced. I have been looking at the Shuksan since it is a bit wider. I believe its also a bit stiffer as well. Any further thoughts on the new ones would be appreciated.

I can't say that I have skied it, but two talented BC skiers I was out with recently were on Shuksans with dynafit bindings. They both raved about this year's Shuksan. Similiar to the world piste but lighter. I was hoping to find a pair for cheap this spring.

Thanks for the feedback. <br> I too am hoping to find a good deal on some Shuksans this spring. Stumbled on a couple pairs of the 8611's at the Seattle REI going for $250.00 and was tempted to buy.

I have skied a pair of the red 8611's with Dynafit TLT bindings for the past 3 years. They are great in powder and corn conditions. The ski is ideal for slalom turns in tight terrain. <br><br>Zap

I have a pair of 190 2 yr old Shuksan's mounted tele and a pair of this years 181 Summits mounted with Dynafits. I really like the way the Shuksans ski and believe that the metal in them does help at speed. <br><br>However the Summits are definitely lighter and great for touring and in fact ski far better than I had anticipated. If you want a light, good climbing ski then consider the Summit since it is pretty good in all conditions except boilerplate and bottomless. The Shuksans would be better in more challenging ski conditions. If long tours or climbing performance is secondary in importance go with the Shuksans.